According to my supervisor, “reading shit” is not an adequate methodology description.
I have struggled with describing the methodology for my work so far. Scientific methodologies are lovely and straightforward compared to those in the humanities. I even find creative methodologies easier to describe than my theoretical ones.
I’m sure there are others in the same boat, so here is a useful post from Pat Thompson using the metaphor of a party to get you thinking about how to approach your methodology chapter.
For those with more time, the University of South Australia has a resource site which runs down most major contemporary social theories in a straightforward way, and can help you get a grip who are the leading theorists in your area.